Saturday, December 13, 2008

Subtle, Less Obvious, Handicaps

Sorry it's been so long since I've posted. What can I say? With Christmas and the new puppy, I've been quite distracted.

For the inspiration of this Post, I have a new comer to thank that just happened to drop by one of my earlier Posts through a Google Search. His name is Cenk and the page he visited is "Shay's Day - Inspirational Story". I guess that it's not so much what he said that inspired me, but the fact that he visited and commented on an earlier Post and thus got me thinking about that Post again. In doing so, I was reminded of something that I thought of saying relating to the subjects of Handicaps and yet never did say it until now.

The story in the linked Post is about baseball and the reaction of a couple of kids to a handicapped boy, yet sometimes on my blog, I like to compare everything to Politics and even though I never did that with this Post, now that Cenk has caused me to revisit it, I have remembered something that I always wanted to say and never did.

In the world of Politics and Capitalism, there are all sorts of Handicaps. Some are severe enough to earn a person Disability Payments. Others just cause people to not do quite as well in the job world as someone else with a higher IQ or with certain God Given skills that assure their success as long as they put out the necessary effort.

I became very keenly aware of this reality when I was in College. With my slow reading and inability to multitask, I had to study more hours than most to achieve the same results. The fact that I graduated with a degree is no less than a miracle. The average class load is 16 Units, but every single time that I tried to handle that much, I ended up dropping back down to 12 Units because that was all I could handle. Consequently, it took me 5 years to complete the goal, instead of only 4. Many students take on full time jobs while going to school. This was not even an option for me because I simply do not posses the mental capacity, nor the energy required. I was often physically sick as it was, even though my schedule contained less than many other students.

I'm not saying that success does not take human effort, cause it does, yet there are those in our society for which massive amounts of effort does not pay off the same as for someone else.

Some people would use this reality as a justification for Socialism. I don't agree that Socialism is the way to go, nor do a agree with those who make a career out of welfare, yet I am sympathetic enough to those who are weak in some ways that I do not agree with some extreme Republicans who seem to want the Government to be so small that Government Assistant Programs are almost non-existent.

I always remembered something that my father once said in relation to getting assistance, or in this case, I believe it was Educational Scholarships. He said, "If a person is poor, he will be O.K. because he will get the Scholarship. If a person is rich, he will not need the Scholarship because he can afford to pay the Tuition, but if the person is Middle Class, he is really screwed because he can neither get the Scholarship, nor Afford to Pay the Tuition."

Actually, this works the same way with Handicaps. If a person is severely Handicapped (or at least enough to be defined as Retarded/Mentally Challenged, Maimed in some way or so Emotionally Disturbed that it is Diagnosed as a Psychiatric Disease), he can get Disability. If a person is not Handicapped at all (or is actually Significantly Gifted), he will not need the Disability, but if a person is only mildly Handicapped (or not quite as Smart, Efficient or Energetic as the rest), he is screwed because he can neither get the Disability, nor Succeed in a Capitalist Society.

I believe that the above linked story about Shay is not just about how we treat those who are handicapped in some obvious way, but also about how we treat anyone who is weaker than ourselves, such as some of those who are poor. Are we willing to help them or do we just judge them automatically as lazy before we've even taken the time to hear their story?

One of my most Favorite Posts that is listed on the right is the one "Lessons for the Strong and the Weak". In this Post, the Strong are told to be Humble, Don't Judge and Give to the Poor, and the Weak are told to share whatever talents they have no matter how small, don't lose heart and don't give up.

I told you of one of my weaknesses, now I will tell you of one of my strengths. I have the ability to sing. Oddly, my brother can't even carry a tune. Not only do I sing, but harmony is second nature to me. The difference between me and my brother is not because someone taught me to sing and he was deprived of the same training. I wasn't even taught how to do harmony. I was doing that as a child and it was second nature to me.

What I found really strange later was not that I had this ability, but that other people didn't. I'm really amazed at times how common it is to walk into a room or a church where people are all singing in unison and once I add a harmony, I'm the only one doing so. How odd it is that God wouldn't pass this Gift around more than He has. This really puzzles me, yet I tell you the truth. It wasn't through effort that this ability has occurred.

Another thing that frustrates me is how rare it is to find an energetic, highly efficient person who actually realizes that they have a God given Gift.

And then there is a highly common phrase that people throw around that isn't even accurate. I'm sure that many of you have heard and possibly even said "If I can do it, anyone can." Well, what if I was to say that "If I can sing Harmony, anyone can."? This sounds like a humble statement, but really it is not because it denies that there is any God given Talent involved and assumes that the credit goes to our efforts and our efforts alone. When this really gets confusing is when Talent and Effort is combined, yet even if the Effort is significant, this still does not negate the reality of the Gift.

I guess the one verse from the Post, "Lessons for the Strong and the Weak", that keeps coming back to my mind in relation to the Strong is 1 Corinthians 4:7, "For who makes you different from anyone else? What do you have that you did not receive? And if you did receive it, why do you boast as though you did not?" (NIV). This Scripture could not possibly ever be repeated too many times, for it is something that we so continually forget.

Another thing that is worth repeating is what I said earlier about the story relating to Shay. I believe that the above linked story about Shay is not just about how we treat those who are handicapped in some obvious way, but also about how we treat anyone who is weaker than ourselves, such as some of those who are poor. Are we willing to help them or do we just judge them automatically as lazy before we've even taken the time to hear their story?

In closing, I'd like to thank Cenk again for commenting and bringing me back to one of my earlier Posts.

9 comments:

The Griper said...

hi lista,
was wondering if the holidays was keepin ya busy.

we have to distinquish between a naturally talented skill and a learned skill. the only difference between the two skills is time and the work that is necessary to say you possess that skill.

the fact it took you 5 years instead of 4 to graduate isn't what is important. what is important is the fact that you did it.

by this achievement you offer people something no person who graduated in 4 years can offer others. you offer them an example of what people can achieve if they do not give up on themselves just because it may be harder for them. you are an example of showing people that just because it may take a little more time than it does others that doesn't mean that they do not have the ability to achieve their goals.

i will guarantee you another thing also, lista. that diploma you earned has far greater value than the diploma of any person who graduated in 4 years.

and yes, there are persons like myself who will say "if i can do it so can you." but we need to understand the implications of that statement. a far better statement would be, "if i can learn to do it, so can you learn to do it."

the primary point of that statement is telling a person not to give up on themselves. we need to remember that the statement is usually used when a person says
" i can't do something" when he really means that he hasn't learned how to do something yet or has given up trying.

The Griper said...

oh, one more thing, lista. the verse you use for evaluation of the strong and the weak, you may like that one but i prefer the story of david versus goliath to illustrate it.

Lista said...

Hi Griper,
I guess I should have known that this post would stimulate more conversation than I may have the time for. I just wrote you a response that is more than a page long and yes, the holidays are keeping me busy.

I'm going to try to read through my response to you and submit it to you some time tomorrow. Be patient.

Lista said...

Yes Griper,
The Holidays have been keepin' me busy. I can't seem to accomplish anything other than Christmas at Christmas time. It just about always feels like the rest of my life has been put on hold every year for about a month.

In relation to your statement, "The fact it took you 5 years instead of 4 to graduate isn't what is important. What is important is the fact that you did it."

Interestingly, I’m always having to remind people when ever I use my own life as an example to make a political point that this isn't about me. This is about politics and about people in general. The reason why the time it takes in order to accomplish a goal is important is because we all have a limited life span and for some there is just not enough time in order to get past all the obstacles and get anything of financial significance done.

And anyway, your statement that "the only difference between the two skills is time and the work that is necessary to say you possess that skill." is not correct. No matter how hard a Mentally Retarded (Mentally Challenged) person works, he will never possess the skills required to do any more than a minimum wage job and that is simply a fact.

It was not just me, Griper, that accomplished my BA. My parents payed the bill. If I had been required to pay for it myself, there is no way that I could have accomplished it and that is simply a fact.

Getting back to the statement "If I can do it, so can you.", or the modified one "If I can learn to do it, so can you learn to do it." I don't really think that the difference between these two statements is that significant.

Whether we are doing or learning is the same difference, yet what I will tell you is that a statement like that means more when it comes from someone who is similar to oneself and I do believe that you and I are similar at least in some ways, so if you were to say that to me, I might actually be persuaded to try, but don't you see? Such persuasion and encouragement can come through Counseling as well and this is why I believe in Government Funded Counseling, not just Training in Skills.

Lista said...

People do not usually get to the point in which they throw up their hands and say "I can't do it!" before trying and by that I also mean trying to learn. I don't like Obama that much, yet the unfortunate truth is that Democrats are quite often more likely to say "Yes, we can!!" in relation to those who are poor as Republicans are, especially Republicans who tend more towards the Extreme in their positions.

Unfortunately, the reason why a person like Obama was so effective when he said that is because he was filling a void that Republicans had left empty.

Yes, I'm a Republican, but I just can't get past what I see as an urgent need to plea to my fellow Republicans to Wake Up and don't come across so proud and insensitive. I believe that this is why we lose elections.

I'm not directing this at you, Griper. I don't know if your ideas are extreme or not. That is for you to decide and for the Lord to reveal to you.

In the Post that I left a link to in this Post, "Lessons for the Strong and the Weak", I included lots of verses besides the one I quoted in the above Post. 1 Corinthians 4:7, quoted above, contains a message to the Strong. In the "Lessons for the Strong and the Weak" Post, I also included verses that contain messages to the Weak. Probably the one that is my favorite is the one in Matthew.

"For verily I say unto you, if ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, remove hence to yonder place and it shall remove, and nothing shall be impossible unto you." Matthew 17:20, KJV.

My conclusion to the section relating to the Weak was "Share whatever talents you have no matter how small or insignificant they may appear. Do not ever lose heart and don't ever, ever give up." The story of David and Goliath is another very good one that I could have included.

The Griper said...

he just sighs. ok lisa, i'll reword my statement

"if i can learn to do it within my potential then you can learn to do it within your potential"

"t was not just me, Griper, that accomplished my BA. My parents payed the bill. If I had been required to pay for it myself, there is no way that I could have accomplished it and that is simply a fact."

yes, lisa, you could have. it may have taken you longer in order to do it but you could have. it may even have taken you almost a lifetime to accomplish but it could have happened. i know that to be a fact. and a diploma earned in 20 years is no different than one earned in a few years.

that's all i'll say on the matter.

Lista said...

Hi Griper,
The key word here is "Potential" and I can only learn to do it if it falls within the limits of my potential.

The response I was expecting, Griper, to my parents paying the bill issue was that there are student loans. I'm a little surprised that you didn't say it. Perhaps it would take almost a life time to pay such a loan off. I really don't know.

As to things that take a life time to accomplish, some of them are worth doing and some are not. Sometimes there are things that fit one's potential better than others and those are the ones that should be pursued.

You can say more on the matter if you want to, Griper. I really didn't mean to scare you off with my "This post could stimulate more conversation than I may have the time for." comment. Just because the conversation may move slower than it has in the past doesn't mean that we can't have the conversation.

BB-Idaho said...

Despite the label "bleeding hearts" that conservatives scornfully label us libs, some people, by nature, seem to care about the less fortunate. It is hard to imagine anyone being poor,
illiterate, homeless or in a soup line by choice. Distain for those who struggle so stained the conservative movement that the term
'compassionate conservatism' was invented..the old 'teach 'em to fish' argument. As you rightfully note, there are those who cannot be taught; there are those that require help for a lifetime. Why should we resent them? So much for the politica view..from a practical standpoint, one of the attributes that separates us from
lower life forms is our humanity towards our fellow beings. Empathy and sympathy should be second nature to us..who would not feed a starving child, for example? You have covered the Christian standpoint, and I would only add that churches lead the way in caring for the less fortunate.
Perhaps in a nutshell, is the view that some among these seeking help are faking it; taking advantage of us. So? such is life..there are those in every area of life that take advantage (check out Wall Street, sometime)..it goes with the territory, and from my experience, those are few...the generations continuing on welfare
(by choice?) being an understandable exception. "Get a job" when there are no jobs is a foolish thing to tell someone with little education and no skill.

Lista said...

Very good comments, BB, and thanks for commenting because it gives me the freedom to finish my thoughts on this subject without feeling like I'm the only one talking. That is, of course, if Christmas doesn't steal away all of my time.